Archive for July, 2008

Council leader backs free street party plan!

Last year, Upland Road residents held a street party in September. Everything was paid for by the residents and by all accounts a great time was had by all.  The highest cost of the event was the price tag charged by Southwark Council for carrying out the consultation for a temporary road closure. This year, the council was quoting £350 for the same service. Upon investigation, I was told that this is the cost of advertising the notice (which is required by law) in the local paper – in this case the South London Press.

 

So you have a case of ‘the council’ appearing to the public to be a total party-pooper when in reality it is just passing on its external costs.  Presumably, other local events like the Goodrich Carnival are also affected.

 

So at Wednesday’s Full Council meeting, I asked the Leader of the Council, Nick Stanton, to consider two possible suggestions for cutting these costs. Firstly, perhaps local papers could levy a ‘community rate’ for those notices that relate to such community events.  Secondly, why can’t such notices be published in Southwark’s own publication, Southwark Life, which is delivered to very household in Southwark? I am pleased to say he said he’d investigate – so watch this space.

Leave a Comment

New School for East Dulwich

After over eight years of campaigning and two years since the Government approved the council plans for a new school, the plans for a new boys’ school took a decisive step forward last night as the planning committee voted unanimously to back the plans for a school on the old boys school site opposite Peckham Rye.  There is not doubt that this is one of the biggest social needs for East Dulwich and I and my colleague Jonathan Mitchell were there to back the plans.

I’ve detailed some of the issues elsewhere on this blog and I still maintain my view that whilst I am sympathetic to those who just don’t like the idea of academies, this is the only game in town if we want a new school.

The key issue other than that has always been the size. The plan is for five forms of entry with a sixth form  – 950 pupils. I have been convinced of the merits of having a sixth form on the site -  particularly in setting a standard for younger kids to aim for.  The committee also heard evidence that the school will provide more external and internal space than other successful new schools. 

This is the only available site for a school in East Dulwich in council ownership and to underdevelop it and limit the numbers would, I feared, end up with the same sort of disappointment in the community as when the Charter School opened; that the new school everyone had been waiting for is found to be inadequate for the community’s need. For that reason I was pleased that Labour councillor, Gordon Nardell found no support for his wrecking amendment to limit the number of school places.   

Within the constraints  that many London schools’ have to operate I think that plans were well worthy of support. Now, finally, we will have decent, free local secondary education for boys. That has to be a good thing.

Leave a Comment

East Dulwich SNUBs plastic bags

A great day on Saturday as we distributed cotton and jute bags to SE22 residents on Lordship Lane. 

The Say NO to Plastic Bags is a community campaign, supported by locals and traders, to promote cloth bags in and around Lordship Lane.  The East Dulwich councillors have been involved from the beginning. We gathered signatures in support at the Dulwich Green Fair and  I am on the SNUB committee. The idea is to reduce plastic bag waste and promote local shopping too.  

Marilyn has been the mainstay of the campaign and she was out all day on the stall.  I helped in the morning and dragged a few young  Thomas helpers along. Amazing how many people made comments about ‘child labour’.  I explained it was ‘child voluntary action’ which is quite different!

There are still bags available in many local shops so get along to pick up yours and help promote local shops and cut down on plastic pollution.

Leave a Comment