Archive for October, 2006

East Dulwich Police Station to close – official

Southwark councillors  have received  the following e-mail from the Borough Commander.  It confirms the threat to East Dulwich police station  from the Labour run Metropolitan Police Authority. The ‘comfort’ is that an equivalent or increased reception desk service will be provided for each of the ten  safer neighbourhood teams in Southwark. 

My problem with this is that when we have campaigned for a proper 24/7 police station in East Dulwich, we have been told by police that this would be a waste of police resources – better to have the bobbies on the beat they say. 

So, will we  be provided with at least ten further PCs or PCSOs to staff these ‘reception desks’? I suspect not.

Will the desk  be little  more than a trestle table in Sainsbury’s? (which might be a good idea but is surely not a substitute for a proper working police station).

I have sympathy with the Borough Commander, who is clearly following a direction from the Labour run Metropolitan Police Authority. But the logic of his email does not apply to Dulwich.

Our station is clearly well located to serve East Dulwich and Dulwich village.  And it is one of the most modern in  Southwark.

I have heard nothing yet to convince me that we should not continue to fight for a proper police presence on our streets – and that includes real working police stations.

—–Original Message—–

: Message from Borough Commander re accommodation plans

The Metropolitan Police Service, under the direction and scrutiny of the Metropolitan Police Authority, regularly reviews it accommodation requirements and plans. In recent years it has been recognised that substantial numbers of police buildings are not necessarily located or designed to support the delivery of the modern police service in Southwark and elsewhere in London. The vision for police buildings in Southwark is an increased presence of smaller bases in the local neighbourhoods combined with a number of larger stations that would continue to support facilities for custody and vehicle patrol. The Safer Neighbourhood Teams are now deployed to all wards in the borough and current activity by our Property Services Department is working to acquire and equip up to ten new Safer Neighbourhood bases for these teams.There is clearly a need to continue our programme of investment in new, modern buildings as replacements for those that are proving increasingly inefficient to use and costly to run. In order to achieve this, our Property Services Department have identified stations that are anticipated to be sold in the medium term – this is in a period between one year and three years hence. Three such police stations are located in this Borough – Rotherhithe, Camberwell and East Dulwich.There is an absolute assurance that the disposal of these police stations will not take place before alternative accommodation is available in the same locality that provides an equivalent or increased reception desk service.I do not underestimate the confidence and reassurance that derives from a sensible presence of police bases within the community. In short, we are committed to increasing the accessibility of our policing services in line with the needs of those who reside in or visit the borough of Southwark.

Malcolm Tillyer
Borough Commander
Southwark

Comments (1)

Council Leader continues fight for new school…

This is the letter the Council Leader has written to the Schools Minister….

  

Andrew Adonis

Parliamentary Under Secretary for State for Schools

Dear Andrew,

Thank you for your letter of 17 October 2006. I am gravely concerned that time is running out if we are to secure the opening of a new boys’ school in September next year – as promised by you in your letter to the EDEN group on 19th December 2005, by the council repeatedly since and by Tessa Jowell MP in an open letter to constituents last month.

It is imperative that the process of recruiting staff begins now and the advertisement for the Headteacher is currently being prepared. It is also vital that planning permission for the temporary school be sought straightaway. Given these two urgent priorities, a delay of a few weeks now will mean we have lost the opportunity to open the new school in September 2007. This was promised to local parents by all levels of Government and by all political parties.  We have already received 200 applications for the 90 places and I am not prepared to disappoint all of those children who have chosen to apply to the school.  For the record, I do not believe that the ‘risk assessment’ in relation to the Bredinghurst site is balanced.  It ignores the mitigating measures suggested by our education department. I have spoken to our borough commander who says that no risk assessment has been made or cleared through the chain of command and that any views attributed to a police officer in the report should not be taken as the views of local police. It also highlights a number of ‘risks’ that would be inherent in any local school, in any planning process and in any new build project.  In our view these risks are inherent in any such project, can be mitigated against and should not prevent us from proceeding.  In many cases we would suggest that as the local planning and education authority, we are in a better position to judge these risks than the consultants employed in this exercise.  It also fails to assess the risks to those pupils who will not be able to attend the new school if the temporary schools fails to open next year, nor to take into account the many families who will consider leaving Southwark.

I must also record my dissatisfaction about the unreasonable way in which this decision appears to have been made.   Given the above, I would have expected a process of discussion with the Council before any final decision.   However, it is clear that by Friday, a decision had been made ahead of the project board meeting, without informing us, failing to give us an opportunity to point out the flaws in the risk assessment and failing to take account of your mitigations of the risks assessed. Indeed you called me to inform me of the decision on Friday as the project board was still meeting.  The aim of the project board meeting appeared to be to tie in other parties to that decision for public consumption. 

You need to decide quickly whether to re-open discussion about Bredinghurst so that the work needed to prepare the planning application can proceed quickly) or to direct the project board to find another site in Southwark.  Experience with the CoLA shows that where there is a political will to find a solution a solution can be found.  You can rest assured that both from an education point of view and as a planning authority Southwark council will take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that our processes are expedited. 

I am more than happy to meet you and discuss what can be done to salvage the situation. The Police Borough Commander would also be happy to attend. I regard it as imperative that our promises to the parents inEast Dulwich are honoured and kept. 

Yours ever,Councillor Nicholas Stanton

LEADER OF THE COUNCIL

Leave a Comment

Local kids let down as Labour pull school plans.

As reported in the local papers, we have just received the devastating news that the Government has announced that the proposed new school for Boys will not now be opened for at least another two years.  

2006-10-19-swk-news-school-billboard02.jpgThe Government had promised local parents a temporary school from September 2007 with a permanent school ready for September 2009.  This was promised not just by the Education Minister but by Tony Blair who came to East Dulwich to launch his academy programme last summer.  So much for high level political support.  The temporary school has  now been abandoned altogether. 

 I reported that this decision was threatened in the summer but staved off after the council leader met with the Schools minister and local MP.   Southwark Council has done everything asked of it by the Academy Project Board and the Government. We identified a temporary site which they agreed as being suitable and we provided a dedicated planning consultant  to help overcome any difficulties.  It has all come to nothing.  A Government that was serious about progressing this plan would have raised concerns about the identified sites much earlier.  They would have given active consideration to ALL SIX sites that the council identified. They have not done so.  

The Government is making a number of completely untrue statements about this decision. They claim that a ‘risk assessment’ shows the plan to be unsafe.  We have provided plans to mitigate against any risks yet these were not even considered before a decision was made.

They Government is even claiming that the decision was taken by a Project Board meeting last Friday. Yet the Council Leader was  rung by the Minister while the meeting was still going on and told that the decision had been taken!

This is an shabby, insulting treatment. But more importantly it is a disgraceful way of making decisions that have such an effect on local children.

I wonder if any ‘risk assessment’ was made of the impact on local children,on local families and on the local community of not providing the schooling promised? 

Even now,  we are clear that  we think that it is still possible to put the temporary school on the Bredinghurst site and we are seeking urgent meetings with the Minister to find out why he has pulled the plug. The Borough Commander has said he is willing to attend such a meeting. Let Tessa Jowell and the Minister explain their ‘risk assessment’ to him. In the meantime we’ll go on reminding people of just what  weight a promise from Tony Blair and Tessa Jowell carries….

Leave a Comment

Is East Dulwich Police Station closing?

The rumours about a possible closure of East Dulwich Police Station have circulating for weeks now.  I and my colleagues have avoided fuelling those rumours  whilst we  sought reassurances from the Borough commander. But those reassurances have not come  and on Friday my fellow East Dulwich Councillor, Jonathan Mitchell, went public in the South London Press with our belief that the police station has already been ear-marked for closure.

The rumours stem from the fact that the Labour-run Metropolitan Police Authority has ordered a review of all stations with a view to selling existing premises to fund new custody centres in London.

We also know that Police Officers and others have been tasked to go around actively looking for accommodation that the Police can relocate to  if and when they move out of East Dulwich Police Station.

We wrote  to the Borough Commander about this matter during the summer but we did not receive a very reassuring response. The opportunity to quosh  the persistent rumours that the East Dulwich Police Station may close was conspicuous by its absence.  

Hundreds  of East Dulwich residents have been supporting the Lib Dem campaign to make East Dulwich a proper working police station – open 24hours a day, 7 days a week. As local councillors,  we have been pressing the for the police to look at ways of making it more viable –like using the station as a base for the council run Community Warden scheme. 

No doubt a decision to flog off the police station will be accompanied by some half baked proposal for a ’safer neighbourhood team base’    The Liberal Democrats are clear that a we need a proper working, staffed police station in our neighbourhood that will make reporting crime easier.  This is what we will continue to fight for. An Peckham based operation with a tokenistic Dulwich outpost will never provide the service this community deserves.

Comments (1)

Council’s New Chief Executive visits East Dulwich

Yesterday morning, James Barber, Jonathan Mitchell and I were able to show the Council’s new Chief Executive, Annie Shepperd around East Dulwich.

East Dulwich councillors with Annie ShepperdWe started at the train station -noting that 10 years into a Labour Government we still don’t have a station with disabled access – and cycled our way through the area finishing off at the Bread of Life cafe and Fair Trade centre at Christ Church.

It was excellent to give Annie a real idea of the issues of concern to local people. For example, we were able to visit Dulwich Baths and talk of the important need to refurbish the pool bringing it up to a 21st Century Standard. We even saw the now defunct baths -which I’m told were still in use up to fifteen years ago.

The visit to East Dulwich Community Centre was particularly useful as she  was able to see the centre being used  (in this instance by an Elderly Black Group) and to discuss ways of ensuring a stable future for the centre.

She was impressed by the range of independent  shops – and the quality of the cake in Blue Mountain cafe –  and we talked about the need to make sure the area didn’t fall victm to a late night drinking culture.

We were also able to impress on her the importance local people put on opening a new secondary school for boys by 2007 and ensuring that the character of the area is not changed by allowing ‘urban’ high rise developments as the Mayor of London wants. 

Coming to an area like Southwark it would be all too easy for a new Chief Execuitve to become obsessed by the high profile areas like Bankside, the Elephant & Castle or Peckham for example. It is to her credit that she wanted to discover all of Southwark and we were delighted to show her our neighbourhood!

  

Leave a Comment